Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:01:30 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Markus =?iso-8859-2?Q?=D6rebrand?= <Markus.Orebrand@operax.com> Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Expandable filesystem with more disk Message-ID: <20060131120130.GC83051@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <33656995C5C5094A983DE84DA649A92449F99D@lulex02.ad.operax.com> References: <33656995C5C5094A983DE84DA649A92449F99D@lulex02.ad.operax.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:19:20PM +0100, Markus =D6rebrand wrote: +> And yes, it would be useful to allow creation with only one provider +> (sorry for the provider/consumer confusion earlier), especially with a +> number of repos of this kind. I committed such functionality to HEAD, should be available in 6.1. +> Still, what are the chances of data corruption when adding more +> providers and then growfs? Growfs comes bundled with warnings at +> least... Adding more providers with gconcat(8) is safe (as long as you don't change the order of providers). I don't know how reliable growfs(8) is... --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD31GaForvXbEpPzQRAi3BAKC5oBsW4CohjoDguStFYZp5yxmGoACgjhHa d7+Q7DhNOve+mz+cxZ9y0CA= =ONcK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060131120130.GC83051>