Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 21:36:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227761] print/freetype2: Fonts aren't correctly rendered with 2.9 Message-ID: <bug-227761-6497-394QuuAPuW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-227761-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-227761-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227761 --- Comment #30 from lightside <lightside@gmx.com> --- (In reply to comment #29) > https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?53739 > Sent me back to this issue. You didn't provide a (public) testcase, i.e. all required information to reproduce (new) issue on developer's machine. For example: the test.pdf fil= e to test, command(s) to run, broken and expected output image(s), etc. Probably, you can't share needed information, because of embedded commercial/copyrighted font(s), confidential text in pdf, etc. Perhaps, the= re is solution for this, if find/create pdf file, which uses public font(s) and text, which reproduces (new) issue. Then possible to share this pdf file wi= th developers, so they can (try to) confirm this issue and test solution(s) for it. If text was readable, but blurry somehow, then possible to try to use png output (instead of jpg): % convert -verbose test.pdf image.png or "-alpha remove" option for jpg output, if this was the case: % convert -verbose -alpha remove test.pdf image.jpg You can try to check some stackoverflow.com pages about mentioned issue and solutions: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6605006/convert-pdf-to-image-with-high-= resolution https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15769623/imagemagick-convert-pdf-to-jpe= g-has-poor-text-quality-after-upgrading-imagemagic (In reply to comment #29) > What kind of debug output will get us a step closer? If you need some kind of debug output, I tried to explain how to create it = on comment #6 and comment #7. On the other hand, you can try to wait response from actual maintainer(s). = But need to note, that Ghostscript (doceng@ for print/ghostscript9-agpl-base) a= nd ImageMagick (kwm@ for graphics/ImageMagick) ports have different assigned maintainers, than FreeType (gnome@ for print/freetype2). Or just use other method(s)/tool(s), which works. Also possible, that this (new) issue maybe fixed in next version(s) of affected software. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227761-6497-394QuuAPuW>