From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 28 23:09:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E24DD5; Tue, 28 May 2013 23:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crodr001@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com (mail-lb0-f177.google.com [209.85.217.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF55131; Tue, 28 May 2013 23:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id o10so8366934lbi.36 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 16:09:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=88+Z2qJJlPt/wKZY7PhNbLLP4DzErOxq3ntBJgkyH9A=; b=REyETal2QS5ViptyhmBsF9f/xnTNVlbKd7sqVY/MFN52/UBiphG5M6WTcH7O/XD0Vn HZtrc2WZqt12xYI9XHNm4BAuncCBB6unquSx+vwtdgvyUFJ3FUhaQkC7qWH9svC5TQO8 R9G8QMy/+RsaOszOeMQrJMLYuFYBaGUfI+0td9qW3bL8mssOBbV/R9DFDyQKXJrGvfii GQI3RIEFeHnn0pBSP50Em1hLkjOxRovjrMs+DW1uRcF3B1lIMwaUuHzOuOshax0NTXRU xz+K/l6TXhgu2ttAhEYShvSlKa8GPT1ffG2D9+gjCAIrWyJO2CZ2gtH2Oe+Tc/1rk7F6 3MAA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.202.198 with SMTP id kk6mr332939lbc.4.1369782557857; Tue, 28 May 2013 16:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.13.135 with HTTP; Tue, 28 May 2013 16:09:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com> <647F6650-AEED-4784-8A45-98324860EE0A@dckd.nl> <519E1A0C.3070609@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 16:09:17 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: F7wslqn-XWHo_QHDbyFwfcICc2Y Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing From: Craig Rodrigues To: Outback Dingo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" , "xen-users@lists.xen.org" , xen-devel , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 23:09:25 -0000 On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: > > I wrote a blog post specifically for installing 10-CURRENT from a snapshot >> ISO and getting bootstrapped >> from there, to help the Google Summer of Code Student that I am mentoring. >> What specifically do you want to be backported to 9-STABLE? >> > > Yes Ive seen the post, however we have a hard requirement for 9-STABLE for > some development work we are > currently involved in. And I would prefer not to move our current > infrastructure for development to CURRENT. > A major portion of our development environment is based on XEN for testing > and development. > Therefor we realize PVHM is a work in progress, and we have built some > VMs from it, they run exceptionally > well, However our build environments refuse to build 9-STABLE on CURRENT > PVHVM, or 10-CURRENT. > Lastly Im sure theres a ton of users who would like to see this in 9.x or > 9-STABLE > > OK, I misunderstood you since you responded in the thread and quoted some of my post. My blog post has nothing relevant to Xen and PVHM, and is specific to setting up a Google Summer of Code student on a 10-CURRENT environment. The FreeBSD Xen and PVHM developers will need to provide the details about their plans to merge their changes to the 9-STABLE branch..... that's something which I am not familiar with. -- Craig