From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 19:19:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E479A2285 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 135B11195 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (75-48-78-19.lightspeed.cncrca.sbcglobal.net [75.48.78.19]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16A9FB94E; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:19:06 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: "Brandon J. Wandersee" Cc: Kevin Oberman , Adrian Chadd , Joseph Mingrone , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: suspend/resume regression Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:07:22 -0700 Message-ID: <6951198.NGhNejXbxL@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <86615mlcto.fsf@WorkBox.Home> References: <86oak289hv.fsf@gly.ftfl.ca> <86615mlcto.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:19:06 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:19:07 -0000 On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 03:10:59 PM Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: > > Please forgive me if this seems impudent, but has there been any progress on > this? The status of the bug report hasn't changed since it was opened. I > don't mean to be rude, and I certainly appreciate the effort that's gone > into this already (especially Kevin's detective work), but support for > suspend-to-RAM and my laptop's hotkeys were essentially the only reasons > I started tracking 10-STABLE to begin with. Since both features were > resolved many months ago, I was hoping to switch from -STABLE to 10.2-RELEASE > when it came out, but I'm starting to get the feeling that won't happen > because of a single errant commit. Having to continue following -STABLE > would not be terrible, but it would be disappointing. As noted previously, I have been moving house and generally offline since mid-June (and I'm not really fully online yet). My last request was if Kevin (or someone else with an affected laptop) could test HEAD to see if there is a missing bugfix on HEAD that needs to be merged. This specific change was tested on HEAD on both a T440 and X220 and on 10 to test the MFC on the T440. -- John Baldwin