Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:07:22 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: "Brandon J. Wandersee" <brandon.wandersee@gmail.com> Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>, Joseph Mingrone <jrm@ftfl.ca>, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: suspend/resume regression Message-ID: <6951198.NGhNejXbxL@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <86615mlcto.fsf@WorkBox.Home> References: <86oak289hv.fsf@gly.ftfl.ca> <CAN6yY1tOsvNbSW-bv_KVwHMjAKfWDVU8e-NRKs5iXjNr1hC6KA@mail.gmail.com> <86615mlcto.fsf@WorkBox.Home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 03:10:59 PM Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: > > Please forgive me if this seems impudent, but has there been any progress on > this? The status of the bug report hasn't changed since it was opened. I > don't mean to be rude, and I certainly appreciate the effort that's gone > into this already (especially Kevin's detective work), but support for > suspend-to-RAM and my laptop's hotkeys were essentially the only reasons > I started tracking 10-STABLE to begin with. Since both features were > resolved many months ago, I was hoping to switch from -STABLE to 10.2-RELEASE > when it came out, but I'm starting to get the feeling that won't happen > because of a single errant commit. Having to continue following -STABLE > would not be terrible, but it would be disappointing. As noted previously, I have been moving house and generally offline since mid-June (and I'm not really fully online yet). My last request was if Kevin (or someone else with an affected laptop) could test HEAD to see if there is a missing bugfix on HEAD that needs to be merged. This specific change was tested on HEAD on both a T440 and X220 and on 10 to test the MFC on the T440. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6951198.NGhNejXbxL>