From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 12:09:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8A1F38; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F62DF8B; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.31.9.201] (unknown [213.225.137.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5965E43BE5; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 07:09:39 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <540EEDF7.7080309@marino.st> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:09:27 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" , FreeBSD Ports , FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: Re: [Bug 144203] textproc/refdb: network clients loop indefinitely when hitting Ctrl-D while client asks for passowrd References: <20140909134908.6d4cfc03.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <20140909134908.6d4cfc03.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:09:51 -0000 On 9/9/2014 13:49, O. Hartmann wrote: > In the strain of a bug I reported I also tried to fix this port, since the prior > maintainer seems to have abandonded this great port. > > I'm a bit pissed off about the rude tune I feel treated! I don't know why you brought the contents of a PR to the mailing list. How have you been mistreated? The port is unstaged. Over 500 unstaged ports have already been removed and refdb is one of the last 20. You personally have known about the removal since 28 July, the day you were also informed the port no longer had a maintainer. > What is the policy of FreeBSD's port system? There are lots of ports waiting to be fixed > since they have serious issue, like silc-toolkit. Is this port also about to be deleted > or isn't there a "lobby" preventing this? There are not "a lot" of ports waiting to be fixed. Of the remaining 21 ports, maybe 25% have some sort of effort. Probably more than half of these are getting removed tonight. silc-toolkit was already staged. Everything is already staged except for these 21 ports. > In a hurry, to prevent the destruction of the port textproc/refdb, I provided a patch. > The patch is a bit messy since I had to incorporate all changes made in the meanwhile > after creation of refdb-1.0.2.tar.gz (provided at: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/refdb/files/latest/download). > > Please see PR "Bug 193484 - [textproc/refdb] Update port". Gee, thanks for opening another PR on the same exact topic. And there's no attachment on that PR. John