From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 12:51:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8243106566C; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451398FC1B; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg2 with SMTP id 2so4321287qwg.17 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 05:51:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ImYaa+zI5JgYFZaEnNUTxdDeWBmuxybojCc38Ub5kzU=; b=bSLk77sT1KzEZ6uVEydScTw2JIRQmpzmlE/+Ahr9Ennqx9dBF5t9eWk5Q+RJHA32gk iwMLdnkVb+vJh0fdcf4swOB8A/8Pxo0dwITscEQbKpttCXvkN7+1RDSo1m0L6tF6yYey KbKX1/0iWxjNZ/jzIoboOed1JJfk78aJleRVk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.61.162 with SMTP id t34mr850468qch.93.1315313466719; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 05:51:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.89.138 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 05:51:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E661254.2000000@yandex.ru> References: <4E64CDA3.2010907@eskk.nu> <4E64D9AB.2040702@eskk.nu> <20110905153115.GA69747@azathoth.lan> <20110905161132.GA84391@elch.exwg.net> <20110905164402.GB70234@azathoth.lan> <4E6526E8.9020901@eskk.nu> <20110906065415.GA2184@reindeer.exwg.net> <20110906120954.GB80802@azathoth.lan> <4E661254.2000000@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:51:06 +0300 Message-ID: From: George Liaskos To: bapt@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libreoffice-3.4.3 fails to upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:51:07 -0000 >> There seems to be failures the installed version<4.4, not sure about that >> yet. >> >> I'm pondering to modify the USE_BDB to force 4.4+ but I need more testings >> >> regards, >> Bapt I vote for removing --with-system-db if it adds complexity and be done with it. The extra time for testing and potential user pain doesn't worth it IMO. Regards, George