From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Nov  9  5:27: 7 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from spammie.svbug.com (mg136-010.ricochet.net [204.179.136.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 078D237B479; Thu,  9 Nov 2000 05:26:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1])
	by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA14148;
	Thu, 9 Nov 2000 05:29:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com)
Message-Id: <200011091329.FAA14148@spammie.svbug.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 05:29:08 -0800 (PST)
From: opentrax@email.com
Reply-To: opentrax@email.com
Subject: Re: RPC not taking the same service twice: a bug or a security meas
 ure?
To: wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: nsayer@sftw.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <20001109011845.1930E37B479@hub.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On  8 Nov, Bill Paul wrote:
>> A coworker seems to have found an issue with portmap on FreeBSD.
>> Aparently, if you try and register the same service twice, but with
>> different protocols (UDP vs TCP), it doesn't work. I'm not entirely sure
>> I believe this, and I am digging for more details, but I am writing to
>> see if anyone can tell me anything that will save me having to do the
>> investigative work. :-) I'll follow up with more details as I can.
> 
> No you won't, because both you and your cow-orker are smoking entirely
> too much crack. (Him for hallucinating this problem in the first place,
> and you for believing him enough to post this query here.)
> 
Hey!! There is no need for this type of response. 
It's obvious the person writing has good intentions,
but has not read a TCP/IP book, that's worth a damm.
I would consider it a personal favor, if this might be
responded to in a less attacking manner.

			best regards,
			Jessem.





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message