From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 27 22:35:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E73106564A for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:613:100::211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D258FC1C for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EEDF91CD23; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:35:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:35:24 +0100 From: Ed Schouten To: Alexander Best Message-ID: <20100227223524.GU8200@hoeg.nl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OxWh+UR3R7TveXYN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] extending {amd64|i386} cpu info X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:35:26 -0000 --OxWh+UR3R7TveXYN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Alexander, * Alexander Best wrote: > + printf(" Stepping =3D %u" > + " Model =3D %u" > + " Family =3D %u", > + cpu_id & CPUID_STEPPING, > + CPUID_TO_MODEL(cpu_id), > + CPUID_TO_FAMILY(cpu_id)); So is there some reason why we don't have a CPUID_TO_STEPPING()? Greetings, --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --OxWh+UR3R7TveXYN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkuJniwACgkQ52SDGA2eCwWwFgCeJhHX0OH7OeJAbf6HzDLhH9Qn tTsAnjIo/zLqJK/1A21uQlMbbAawEYRn =oPmt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OxWh+UR3R7TveXYN--