From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 10 11:09:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1917A1065680 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.64.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556B38FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8AB9fbL066734; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:09:41 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8AB9f9K066733; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:09:41 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:09:41 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Mark Atkinson Message-ID: <20120910110941.GT44854@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120905115140.GF15915@FreeBSD.org> <50476187.8000303@gibfest.dk> <20120905183607.GI15915@glebius.int.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] merging projects/pf into head X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:09:47 -0000 On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:32:25AM -0700, Mark Atkinson wrote: M> On 09/05/2012 11:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: M> > What's bad with "getting stuck" with old syntax? I personally don't M> > have any problems with it. I have had problems with performance, M> > however. M> M> Just as an aside is there a decent set of stable web docs for M> FreeBSD's current syntax? I'm constantly burned when I try to looks M> something up (because it isn't working like I expect) and all I find M> is the new, sexy syntax with all it's quick 'match' operators and M> their ilk. I usually look at man pf.conf when I have problems with syntax. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.