Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:42:09 -0500 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, cvs-src@yandex.ru Subject: Re: Recent massive port update. Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002052239120.4622@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny> In-Reply-To: <20100205225039.GA81606@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <1781265383542@webmail54.yandex.ru> <20100205225039.GA81606@owl.midgard.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:50, ertr1013@ wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:25:42PM +0300, cvs-src@yandex.ru wrote: >> Hi there. >> I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the >> reason of it (nor on freebsd-ports@, nor on freshports.org). Can >> anybody shed the light what was changed? > > The graphics/jpeg port was updated such that the version number of > libjpeg.so was increased. This necessitated a revision bump in all the > ports that depend on graphics/jpeg. There are *many* such ports. > > > >> >> Thanks. >> >> [root@smeshariki2 ~]# portsnap fetch >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done. >> Fetching snapshot metadata... done. >> Updating from Fri Feb 5 06:44:34 MSK 2010 to Fri Feb 5 15:57:40 MSK 2010. >> Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. >> Applying metadata patches... done. >> Fetching 0 metadata files... done. >> Fetching 4282 patches..... > I could have swore that I recently heard an announcement that barred this type of activity until after 7.3-RELEASE was made.... Guess that doesn't stand for everything. Was there some type of security concern that caused this bump of jpeg in the first place or was it just a creeping featurism? -- jhell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1002052239120.4622>