Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Jun 2000 09:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
To:        Dave Preece <dave.preece@kbgroup.co.nz>
Cc:        "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   RE: Path MTU discovery.
Message-ID:  <200006081600.JAA24953@nomad.yogotech.com>
In-Reply-To: <67B808B0DD93D211ABEE0000B498356B02BC71@internet.kbgroup.co.nz>
References:  <67B808B0DD93D211ABEE0000B498356B02BC71@internet.kbgroup.co.nz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Just learning about this: I can see the advantages but does 
> > anything use it?
> > 
> > Sure, TCP uses it.
> > 
> So... thinking about what this means for firewalls and natd. If we block all
> incoming ICMP's across the firewall

The moral of the story is don't block *ALL* incoming ICMP's across the
firewall. :)

Something like:

/sbin/ipfw add 1000 pass icmp from any to any via ${netif} icmptypes 0,3,11

Works for me, although you may not want type 11 packets coming in.  (I
allow them in, so I can run traceroute);


Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006081600.JAA24953>