Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:49:55 +0100 From: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> To: John Marino <marino@freebsd.org> Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r372684 - head/www/rejik Message-ID: <CAALwa8kAih6mObjUxfOcYvT7RQx50yrVCwJom0J=FZwsA0OwJQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <546A5D30.4020300@marino.st> References: <201411172031.sAHKVvih060140@svn.freebsd.org> <546A5D30.4020300@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:40 PM, John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> wrote: > On 11/17/2014 21:31, Antoine Brodin wrote: >> Author: antoine >> Date: Mon Nov 17 20:31:56 2014 >> New Revision: 372684 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/372684 >> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r372684/ >> >> Log: >> Mark BROKEN (please don't resurect broken ports...) >> > > > I believe the port was a new effort -- it wasn't just a revival. > > Is failure to stage as non-root considered "broken" ? Wouldn't there be > a lot of broken ports with that criteria? Hi, Failing to build/stage as a regular user is generally not considered broken. But it's not best practice and often there is something fishy in those ports, like files needing special ownership but @(owner,group,) missing from plist. Currently less than 200 ports fail to build/stage as a regular user (less than 1% of the ports tree). In the case of rejik I was going to fix it (removing one line from the Makefile) but then I noticed it was doing other things wrong... Cheers, Antoine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAALwa8kAih6mObjUxfOcYvT7RQx50yrVCwJom0J=FZwsA0OwJQ>