Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Aug 2020 22:14:59 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 247772] IPv6 hostname is not resolving while adding new rule
Message-ID:  <bug-247772-8303-vzHnxX8r5B@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-247772-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-247772-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247772

Evgeniy Khramtsov <evgeniy@khramtsov.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |evgeniy@khramtsov.org

--- Comment #4 from Evgeniy Khramtsov <evgeniy@khramtsov.org> ---
(In reply to Aleksey Bondarenko from comment #0)

Do you still have this issue if you try

ipfw -q add 00100 allow src-ip6 ipv6.google.com dst-ip6 me proto tcp in via
vtnet0 setup

?

>From ipfw man page:

The rule body has the following format:

[proto from src to dst] [options]

The first part (proto from src to dst) is for backward compatibility with
earlier versions of FreeBSD.  In modern FreeBSD any match pattern (in-
cluding MAC headers, IP protocols, addresses and ports) can be specified
in the options section.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-247772-8303-vzHnxX8r5B>