From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Thu Dec 19 22:12:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB39A1EC4C7 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 22:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f53.google.com (mail-ot1-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47f5j75wL0z49bJ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 22:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f53.google.com with SMTP id w1so9103842otg.3; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:12:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T/Wj4zuX3Lzil5XqzMZpUEFMwMJLXydmRtqcGGFDkIQ=; b=l9bhqvGldG51cZnu7XVoCvmgdkxI7JiTrBKJNf6fRJxdq1CprTWzag7HPNzQFH4/TV GHNgp11+clZcFsBRsU732KJAkGgcTPGH37vp6yjF4gy0Bk5MfX7MMWwgpqLeHC4vyYsL w7ySrDUqo3VQQJhkS89Us8RYOudzlfh4QqmBEqCE9w1sm4rm55NaokvKL2arfumEoaUe 6qUO9oeyFnLBHnTqUVF2qA/dQiQKSjvxdtNaRhn+l8l/cR+4vSB8AhzZr01c8+a/xfgC v7Hg66SU4QhXW0HI/FfC6HdeoymSwL3RGRCaVD9U///BISzR12enL2NMi+wY8/cU+u9F +KOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVOX+TCpL9HRugzrswJL9gSpwrfnZTOCwyxyKP0wdBYBBb9Rqc4 wQ+MufIkA/sOSBrKsjzbHE/QoVfw X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw72wYqHmtork849bX3dtvwq1VWroz6m6QzIGTp/SSQd82k7cOQf349IMvK47ZYT7tf6Wh6Nw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1248:: with SMTP id s8mr11222421otp.202.1576793562169; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:12:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ot1-f48.google.com (mail-ot1-f48.google.com. [209.85.210.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a19sm33865oto.60.2019.12.19.14.12.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:12:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-f48.google.com with SMTP id p8so9071918oth.10; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:12:41 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7593:: with SMTP id s19mr10528265otk.219.1576793561756; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:12:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9b556cbe-f9f3-ab15-6fcd-71397d18c126@freebsd.org> <20170623104654.07e5a3e0@ernst.home> <45b0864b-680c-8fe0-f5a5-353b6373d069@freebsd.org> <20170624045543.GY39245@kduck.kaduk.org> <201912191647.xBJGleRa028173@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <8abe794b-90ff-d577-3b75-75a02a411712@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <8abe794b-90ff-d577-3b75-75a02a411712@quip.cz> Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:12:30 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: SMBv1 Deprecation / SMBv2 support in FreeBSD To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Alan Somers , freebsd-fs X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47f5j75wL0z49bJ X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of csecem@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=csecem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.22 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[53.210.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[53.210.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.22)[ip: (-1.03), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.12), asn: 15169(-1.90), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 22:12:44 -0000 Any smb2/3 port definitely isn=E2=80=99t landing in 11.3, so there=E2=80=99= s similar constraints there (in addition to being vaporware). :-) On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:49 Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > Alan Somers wrote on 2019/12/19 21:26: > > [...] > > > I think you should give it a shot. I rewrote the FUSE kernel module fo= r > > FreeBSD 12.1. Some of the changes, like to cacheing, could have big > > effects on smb performance. And cem made some changes in 2018 to the > > I/O size which led to big improvements in other file systems' > > performance, too. At the very least a benchmark would be interesting. > > I know you made many changes in FUSE unfortunately our production > servers are on 11.3. They will be upgraded later in Q2 2020. > I believe FUSE works much better now but smbnetfs is still kind of > complicated to use globally from fstab instead of per user. > I will try to find some 12.1 machine and try to benchmark it with > smbnetfs in January. I will let you know. > > Kind regards > Miroslav Lachman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >