From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov  3 13:18:24 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1F6106564A
	for <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  3 Nov 2011 13:18:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.212.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFFB8FC13
	for <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  3 Nov 2011 13:18:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so1678333vws.13
	for <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=wgw8v7jidPux7rRdajZlUVcHeVLv5lpWJo7N5s6DB4o=;
	b=JFT6EwX4zzSOZVb3EVzukERNn5hLLB5eF1VqNo1Dpq4peBUXiTl8fNrjHhkXPqmt8d
	DUiIYPwOXT1hkkezSg6pYNM9OoBgjtBO6KPViT2jKTVFJEDz4AXWatKq6/G7iN0l/QVa
	Kk8tPLdBi04YSpKCwIwJVfCtoXiLPpj94k+iM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.177.3 with SMTP id cm3mr9488693vdc.89.1320326303046; Thu,
	03 Nov 2011 06:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.29.198 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 06:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAUsrB6eoHhtsu7BBxxxhteuchFyv5=Yo3pJUfsZFEJ9MB4Cgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ-VmokMuG3iSL78JryafLF2m28=f2QPtqwApT5Akf4DXDFJhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAUsrB6eoHhtsu7BBxxxhteuchFyv5=Yo3pJUfsZFEJ9MB4Cgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 06:18:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmoke-pUB+XPtDcOGv3rCf5wpPcsw5Z8EhkUaecwpNd8EPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
To: Berislav Purgar <bpurgar@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AR9280 and noisy environments, please test
X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack,
	tools device driver development." <freebsd-wireless.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:18:24 -0000

On 3 November 2011 04:11, Berislav Purgar <bpurgar@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Adrian
>
> I attach results of my testing :)
>
> messages-1 dump is after sysctl dev.ath.1.hal.cca=-85

Thanks!

Your NF isn't too crazy:

Nov  3 12:01:04 pila kernel: NF calibrated [ctl] [chain 0] is -105
Nov  3 12:01:04 pila kernel: NF calibrated [ctl] [chain 1] is -106
Nov  3 12:01:04 pila kernel: NF calibrated [ext] [chain 0] is -103
Nov  3 12:01:04 pila kernel: NF calibrated [ext] [chain 1] is -105
Nov  3 12:01:04 pila kernel: CCA: [0: -85][1: -85][3: -85][4: -85]

.. and your RX environment isn't too busy:

Nov  3 12:01:05 pila kernel: rxc=5, extc=0, rxf=2, txf=1
Nov  3 12:01:05 pila kernel: rxc=3, extc=0, rxf=1, txf=1
Nov  3 12:01:05 pila kernel: rxc=17, extc=0, rxf=3, txf=9

.. so you were saying that before I turned off OFDM weak detection,
you'd still get lots of OFDM PHY errors in -this- RF environment?


adrian