From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 17:56:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55EB16A4D0; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:56:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7966143D5D; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:56:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9QHuZW8004111; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:56:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9QHuYdD004110; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:56:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:56:34 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20041026175634.GB3750@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200410252004.i9PK4ojH033460@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041026080742.GA88278@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk sys.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:56:42 -0000 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:44:03AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > "David O'Brien" writes: > > The way you've attached my name to this sounds like I am leading the > > charge to do this in userland. I'm not. I simply said if you're so > > confident that our userland is OK with -O2 that you should switch our > > defaults to it.[*] OR stop being semi-obnoxious using uses secret CFLAGS > > on the tinderboxes and then complaining about anyone who commits code > > that doesn't compile only with those flags. > > There is nothing secret about the tinderbox. The scripts and > configuration files it uses are in CVS (src/tools/tools/tinderbox), > and complete logs are available online. I wonder what would have happened if I or someone would have made a commit to the scripts to use -O rather than the unsupported [at the time] -O2?? .. > Finally, please stop pulling the "toolchain maintainer" card every > time something like this comes up. AFAIR, you resigned from that post > (and made a loud and public fuss about it) a long time ago. I'm still a FSF GNU committer, I just got tired of doing imports into FreeBSD. I am still the FreeBSD Binutils maintainer (both in and out of tree). That said, where did I 'pull the "toolchain maintainer" card' in this thread. Oh, in the private message where you told me I've been alseep and that RE@ has been building releases with -O2 for a quite a while now? I pulled the "I'm the one that made the first Makefile commit to use -O2 in amd64 kernels card so I know something about its first use in the tree card." -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)