From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 27 14:22:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD532D7 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnebdal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502DE3DD for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id fe20so621042lab.29 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:22:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=c2VoGHJ/Kfhj6nqkWNkuba/FY4qqEunzbSwLbAQUSL8=; b=hs4jOJszMBtFvNqiROYQXGBwxMOXpImZiujrFqdubFegNDNF85LMjYsxargOdipR9M q8GaXvUPXCcqk13Rqe5r92Iq5GG5qzgtofkmQmFTf9Lj11LP0LFU73TyEl7fNgYJ7+MF m6Fk9wzUHbWdhRcJGWhqkHoltetqdvaaiOYNRKUwkZAx3xeIaIaTNBmugCihGqQz6w+1 mmjcLfPAJGl78/0U/mtP4oRb8E163ht2Cr1hDZPRij9/mTimdZOK4ikmEGNr4iU57SgO l325Y5L1yEQUXscqS+a2KmzXIzApymaLuyymAsnF3rwl761W0k/9Sj9ETeQXA5qEr/Uc /+4g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.84.164 with SMTP id a4mr2163690lbz.10.1361974975237; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:22:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.80.133 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:22:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <512DE205.4010202@digsys.bg> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:22:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Response of *.freebsd.org websites are very slow From: Daniel Nebdal To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Current , Daniel Kalchev X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:22:56 -0000 Ok, that's weird. What does a simple "nslookup ftp.freebsd.org" give you? On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > >> >> >> On 27.02.13 12:23, Daniel Nebdal wrote: >> >>> I think you're supposed to be automatically sent to the mirror that is >>> closest to you - for some value of "closest". If the mirror you're >>> getting has issues, that might show up like this. Could you post the >>> output of "traceroute ftp.freebsd.org" ? It should show which mirror >>> you're getting, and perhaps if there are any obvious problems on the >>> way. >>> >> >> I believe, in his case that would be "traceroute ftp.tr.freebsd.org". The >> list of mirrors is here http://www.freebsd.org/doc/** >> handbook/mirrors-ftp.html >> >> in any case, "anything *.freebsd.org" actually refers to plenty of hosts >> all over the world -- some might be slow, some very fast. >> >> On the other hand, "Address could not be found" type of errors indicates >> something else than "fast" or "slow". >> >> Daniel >> > > > "traceroute ftp.tr.freebsd.org" > > is working . > > > "traceroute ftp.freebsd.org " > > is NOT working . > > > Thank you very much . > > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"