From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Jul 23 2:22:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E79F14F88; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 02:22:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA04948; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:21:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Cc: newton@atdot.dotat.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/7925: sendmail, inetd SIGSEGV after forking after "enough" days of uptime References: <199907211947.MAA05600@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 23 Jul 1999 11:21:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: 's message of "Wed, 21 Jul 1999 12:47:53 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org writes: > Mark, could you see whether you still have this problem in 3.2-STABLE > or 4.0-CURRENT? I've just MFC'd a number of recent changes to > STABLE's inetd, and a goodly number of bugs have been fixed this year. > ;-) The bug described in this PR is not specific to any particular daemon (inetd or other). It's the infamous "dying daemons bug" which I believe was tracked down to a VM bug and fixed early this year. Check the cvs-all archives. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message