From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 27 20:01:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA04416 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 20:01:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA04390 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 20:00:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA02463; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 03:39:26 GMT (envelope-from brian@gate.lan.awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199801280339.DAA02463@awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Archie Cobbs cc: mrcpu@cdsnet.net (Jaye Mathisen), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.2.5+ handle 32bit UID In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Jan 1998 16:20:52 PST." <199801280020.QAA18404@bubba.whistle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 03:39:26 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Jaye Mathisen writes: > > or 31 bit? > > > > >From looking at some tests over NFS, it looks like it certainly supports > > >65535, but I wanted to know if it was consistent everywhere... > > > > IE, uid's of 100000+ are OK. > > Yes, should work. I thought that NFS used 16 bit ids, so it may not > work for that. Hmm, I read (probably from usenet) today that ``ar'' doesn't grok big uids. > -Archie > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com -- Brian , , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....