From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 23 06:15:35 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7CC1916A4CE; Sun, 23 May 2004 06:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp07.web.de (smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4776943D2F; Sun, 23 May 2004 06:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kay_lehmann@web.de)
Received: from lehmann.in-dsl.de ([217.197.85.240] helo=web.de)
	by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128)
	(WEB.DE 4.101 #91)
	id 1BRspC-0002BC-00; Sun, 23 May 2004 15:15:34 +0200
Message-ID: <40B0A3EA.9080706@web.de>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 15:15:22 +0200
From: Kay Lehmann <kay_lehmann@web.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-AT; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040405
X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20040523101300.GA43113@genius.tao.org.uk>
	<40B09066.1020300@web.de> <20040523122832.GF40899@genius.tao.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20040523122832.GF40899@genius.tao.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: kay_lehmann@web.de
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade and daemons.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 13:15:35 -0000

Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:52:06PM +0200, Kay Lehmann wrote:
> 
>>As far as I know this isn't the job of portupgrade. Normally it should 
>>be handeled by the port itself, which could stop daemons with 
>>appropriate set (de)install targets.
>>I think a lot of the ports do this quite properly. Moving this to Mk 
>>looks quite complicated and I think it would be the best to leave it in 
>>the ports, since they should know what is required to do.
>>
> 
> 
> Ah ok.  That makes sense. Do you know of a port that does this properly
> off the top of your head?
> 
> Joe
I think cups-base has some code.

Greets,
Kay