From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 29 10:12:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA2B15846 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:12:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA08286; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:12:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id KAA19544; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:12:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199904291712.KAA19544@vashon.polstra.com> To: sprice@hiwaay.net Subject: Re: (FWD) Re: Progs linked against libstdc++ dead... In-Reply-To: <19990429092327.A85225@nuxi.com> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > ----- Forwarded message from Steve Price ----- > > Since the vtable thunks are more efficient and will eventually > be the default, we might ought to stick with them. David mentioned > that there might be problems with them, but with enough developers > using -current to beat out the kinks we should be able to resolve > them in short order. I doubt it. The problems, according to the egcs team, are compiler bugs. It's unlikely any of us could fix them without going into a trance, smoking the g++ pipe three times a day, and abstaining from sexual relations for a year. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-interest is the aphrodisiac of belief." -- James V. DeLong To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message