From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 04:25:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1ACAA5B; Thu, 22 May 2014 04:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C51224A; Thu, 22 May 2014 04:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s4M4PTAF029123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 May 2014 22:25:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s4M4PTwx029120; Wed, 21 May 2014 22:25:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 22:25:29 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Allan Jude Subject: Re: [patch] zfs sysctl patch In-Reply-To: <537D7431.4070103@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <537D7431.4070103@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 21 May 2014 22:25:30 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Benedict Reuschling , Eitan Adler X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 04:25:31 -0000 On Wed, 21 May 2014, Allan Jude wrote: > A recent commit (r266497 by smh) added a number of new sysctls for ZFS > > Two of these had minor typos, and the phrasing of another was very awkward. > > --------------- > > Improve sysctl descriptions for: > vfs.zfs.dirty_data_max > vfs.zfs.dirty_data_max_max > vfs.zfs.dirty_data_sync Nice. Approved for the doc side, but please also get approval from smh.