Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 05:07:18 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223176] [revive port] archivers/zipios: small C++ library for reading and writing zip files Message-ID: <bug-223176-13-HsGuEWEMyA@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-223176-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-223176-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223176 --- Comment #13 from bcomputerguy <owen94012@gmail.com> --- The email address is valid and should not be an issue. I am learning to do more tests on these ports before I submit them We (strongly) encourage contributors to test/QA proposed changes with the t= ools that our developers use, both to improve their skills but also to identify = any issues early and save time/resources. - Consider settting DISTNAME=3Dzipios++, so that MASTER_SITES doesn't need = to be customised (and one can just use 'SF') I asked about this issue and it was also brought up in comment #6 as well: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223176#c6 The maintainers want to change the name to zipios and they did do that on t= he github page but the older SF page; which is no longer maintained still uses zipios++ I thought it would be better to go with zipios since that's where all the w= ork is being done. - Obsolete any older/outdated attachments, so only one is visible. This mak= es it more obvious and avoids confusion. You can do this via Attachment -> Det= ails -> Edit Details -> [x] Obsolete Done --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-223176-13-HsGuEWEMyA>