From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue May 16 14:10: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A1937B54B for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 14:10:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA54182; Tue, 16 May 2000 14:10:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:10:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200005162110.OAA54182@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Brooks Davis Subject: Re: conf/18583: [PATCH] DHCP should be able to override hostname. Reply-To: Brooks Davis Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR conf/18583; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brooks Davis To: "David O'Brien" Cc: Brooks Davis , Sheldon Hearn , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/18583: [PATCH] DHCP should be able to override hostname. Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:06:44 -0700 On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 01:22:20PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > If that has been a real option, I would have done it. However, dhclient > > communicates with it's script through the environment and rc.conf et al > > /sbin/dhclient-script should be rewriten. There is a nice script in a PR > on dhclient. However it is the 4-clause BSDL, and the author has not > replied to my requests to make it a 2 or 3-clause BSDL. Ok, that script does look nice. Should I consider that to be the minimum standard for changes to the dhclient-script? If so, I guess I'll try a re-write of the dhclient-script with an eye towards that degree of flexability under a more friendly license. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message