From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Apr 18 14:51: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from meow.osd.bsdi.com (meow.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3925637B641 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:51:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@jhb-laptop.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241]) by meow.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f3ILofG59968; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:50:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200104182103.f3IL3Hw95208@gratis.grondar.za> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:50:06 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin To: Mark Murray Subject: Re: Please review - header cleanups Cc: smp@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 18-Apr-01 Mark Murray wrote: > Said John Baldwin : >> Well, I put that up there because I was under the impression that >> nested includes were to be avoided at all costs based on previous >> discussions with Bruce. It seems now that Bruce was more just trying >> to discourage the practice but not condemning those particular cases >> as the alternatives were worse. In the case of determing if headers >> should use nested #includes, etc. I defer to Bruce as he is more >> authoritative in this area. > > Abandon project? Whatever Bruce says is to happen as far as header cleanups basically. -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message