From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Sep 28 13:35:57 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CBF127833 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46gV6h1jsQz4Dfn for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FCC21B81 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 09:35:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 28 Sep 2019 09:35:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=CWEg2rzY40JnlKqb3XGylSr6hMA e6pJvMZaHsaVPbnM=; b=XstzqXy58gwo/3RBlxZV/MiL/BN7iaKq/CgSMmIZY91 WuP9sxqHUQkjfXe7JEuPyWh/pJzfP1HRL58ocSA1EwExfKXV0v6ZCtBf9IFA57Jh M+uARRai5UG/qIxXAy5c7KvfCCD8hpdQNArPVKPTK4KEiJDQIkLHOl74o+TulEfB 1rY9+Z52uVGDT04BLmQ1N7uzknnd4sFCgf13pUQ4D3X4T/P4VcD0bWItPL6cNIId IIVmgdW2VwQolTpF0Lj3pvsPROhzeCQfhPJAZf7stRhyZl+7OscKjXhEJf31XZzx cZq2VwYun0wDUtZDY0VwgLtNg7h3aguB5iS3Lcn+3rw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=CWEg2r zY40JnlKqb3XGylSr6hMAe6pJvMZaHsaVPbnM=; b=AB8Cm83HHtLa4Nl4HocMt9 aregS4QQa16hOrG/gMVcn15ErwMlsMcV6KlXK75yBhWwkoCIm8P19d5dwx/3G/6M TqNUAxJPR5o+kMr6zvPwHA80WGBAxENTObD6XtxW17T6d5nQBVZZ6dNAl6Mkmjq/ LjF3EQWCjDq8ENLf/D9+s2qJOP8Za5rrUsTqulfajPt34zf+rbONBwn90ZC5gvf5 zqWo0GyCzqKpBbvocSelUOrY8u2Perwez+HC3NuZS4FjwMsUfs4S1dI8jsSGpBPr qcVWIjD6SZ/McS8aXdtLj1Uj7xAIL3H6TCTdbkkr+1R3Al3zwYgXCZm5sGgtn+7g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrfeekgdeiiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesghdtre ertdervdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghenucfkphepke dvrdejtddrledurdelleenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhs thhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0EE3480059 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 09:35:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:35:52 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make.conf for a poudriere jail and CPUTYPE Message-ID: <20190928133552.GD49516@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20190927113336.GB49516@bastion.zyxst.net> <20190928121624.GC49516@bastion.zyxst.net> <20190928150629.914bf447.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GpGaEY17fSl8rd50" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190928150629.914bf447.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46gV6h1jsQz4Dfn X-Spamd-Bar: -------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=XstzqXy5; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=AB8Cm83H; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.29]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[29.4.111.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.48)[ip: (-9.81), ipnet: 66.111.4.0/24(-4.85), asn: 11403(-2.68), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:35:57 -0000 --GpGaEY17fSl8rd50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 03:06:29PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: >On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:16:24 +0100, tech-lists wrote: >> thought I'd experiment. Seems setting CPUTYPE?=3Dbtver1 causes some port= s to >> fail at the configure or build stage. python36 and lzo2 for example. Uns= ure >> why that should be (or where to ask???) > >Some ports are restricted in a way that they can only be built >for specific architectures. Not everything is "cross-platform >compatible". :-) For example, some ports will only work on i386 >and amd64 because they contain assembly code that is only supported >on those two architectures, and _not_ on, let's say, arm or ppc. > >Reference: https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ > >For https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo I'd say the best >list to ask specific questions probably is the freebsd-ports >mailing list. OK I'll do that. I was wondering if it needed to go in -toolchain as btver1 and sandybridge are the same arch (amd64) just different cpus. What do you think? thanks, --=20 J. --GpGaEY17fSl8rd50 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl2PYa8ACgkQs8o7QhFz NAX9tBAArka0Oizbxl/R7N0fD5H6uRrSEumDNXDSq05176G9FT+aQFiinOhqDHM3 KcMVzGwCBU/2GTHo6YI+CxDlAJ9BWRaMF53UirBSuVsdy2khGmz0x+3GI5KdCDl9 LLeQNVYEqEQvPajBdQ3XwOt1tJufoIhO6Y9klmfsi4ubO54gy3pPKkbXM9F8uQU6 kb//J0kdbD/eD15jWWG0ErKFag0gm7HP4qkXszfh00q9kK4b+WXVkZ0t9/j03Fns 6j/lpdghkazBQrqbuaW8YmuFTSJDV7CoruGtfJ67qStEkvmJhETFiir8MgjjDS4Y /OHLPeDS4tU1CYzREcr6Ii3KED0QSJgM+ScEPIhHD5YsX0ipln8kSV/ctFS8/IUL CKUuEs5dtQ6w0uxltpYXmH5q3PRIUUh6BtvNO9k4aZyeUf1mbxKL/KcG/UmuTbYq E0hebJa6LSh4jwBx9lcSyjmPLrLrCPUxGy1JlrV/g68x/ZSZmjgd5yFu9gv7qczU Tq2r7BYGm8OWVI9+TDLCtZS9CWwy3lyt6kqxtOZJ3sAUt6NEfAHH9kb2ixMx7qCB IcvlrZwW+513DDbTD1ivNZ1781MHDBpejE7cQsMrI3YQMf1QehYLiKXfDt9Y4jvY rmTH64jwrXL2iTaHl8XmSUlwl88ZdKu0u8Wqu2HKNNRVI1v88Zc= =qNiG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GpGaEY17fSl8rd50--