From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 4 20:03:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA20836 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 20:03:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from scanner.worldgate.com (scanner.worldgate.com [198.161.84.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA20823 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 20:03:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcs@znep.com) Received: from znep.com (uucp@localhost) by scanner.worldgate.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with UUCP id VAA21061 for hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 21:03:14 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by alive.znep.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA20922 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 21:01:47 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 21:01:47 -0700 (MST) From: Marc Slemko To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ipfw logs ports for fragments Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe hackers" Feb 4 16:08:27 zaius /kernel: ipfw: 320 Deny UDP 199.170.121.15:14592 198.161.84.2:2 in via de0 Fragment = 29 Trust me, those port numbers are not right. ipfw should not log the port number if a packet is a fragment.