From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 15:45:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3E816A41A for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:45:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from mx-outbound01.easydns.com (mailout.easydns.com [205.210.42.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDC913C478 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (unknown [69.12.173.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-outbound01.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAA58349 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:45:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (slider.shadypond.com [192.168.1.11]) by slider.shadypond.com (postoffice) with ESMTP id 460D8B65A4 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:45:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Pollywog To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:45:01 +0000 References: <1190618389.1658.7.camel@viola.izb.knu.ac.kr> In-Reply-To: <1190618389.1658.7.camel@viola.izb.knu.ac.kr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709241545.01510.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Subject: Re: Is your Thunderbird OK? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:45:15 -0000 On Monday 24 September 2007 07:19:49 Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > Hi there, > > Just been wondering about this for long weeks. I have some complain > Thudnerbird's the speed when it start up on FreeBSD. Its speed is very > slow. While thunderbird start up, I go to brew coffee. Aside from that, > Thunderbird is the best MUA, indeed. I have not noticed this speed issue with Thunderbird. I use kmail for the most part but now and then some mail is not visible in kmail and appears to be just headers with no message body, and in those cases I use Thunderbird to read those emails that I can't see in kmail. Thunderbird comes up as fast as kmail does. The only problem that I do have with Thunderbird is that it sometimes says that I have the maximum number of connections (I use IMAP) open. kmail never says that.