From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 02:23:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5682BCF6 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 02:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greglmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com (mail-oa0-f52.google.com [209.85.219.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B03BDE for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 02:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k14so8536427oag.25 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:23:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rvex30iyxmwqSPYIpHwcEIM+e7KOBDyRaDg85tzHDhE=; b=y2lOYCFABNtcxUc8X+PxXK0raL6IFEKfhDVtbbjm9HdL8VhEc/VcorebgXtNCWnD6j cczIkF+QxXKhXfBN2QjUlgy9aX++WJ3OHh+Sg67qyjDght8IVePR4AnvUPTOuO6ppPsv zPX5y0EOx8OSBlvZSWduBLoI8ZPjbLW0tQKnhWkaAyLhR856ygKxN9htcKg6s0kwCvf+ 72R05O8HSkhexe9EUXsWWZOydUAOf0Nj2Sog2Z6m6Kfc2WjCyEUks3EaaSUX7wPmQ1wZ Q2jaaCg2l/nssoJsw8q8K8QAYabvvbB7IpE4S+9bV9sm64TKC2NRwaukbMXeVu5GBW1q PauQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.1.225 with SMTP id 1mr9987152oep.141.1361413400039; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:23:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.92.130 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:23:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <51250E61.8080209@gmx.de> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com> <1361297952.1164.83.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <5123CA4C.90703@aldan.algebra.com> <51250E61.8080209@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:23:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? From: Greg Miller To: freebsd-stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 02:23:21 -0000 On 2/20/13, Matthias Andree wrote: > What is your point, besides getting software from the museum to build > stuff from the relative future? I can't speak for the OP, but I tried it because clang, gcc46, and gcc47 wouldn't produce a working executable at all for a long time (and continue to fail) on my 9.0 and 9.1 systems. There's been so much libreoffice breakage that I don't even bother reporting it or making much effort to fix it. I just reboot to Windows for the cases where I need a working libreoffice. I don't much care whether gcc 4.2 produces a working libreoffice; I just wish something did.