From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Dec 4 20:22:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from foo.sics.se (assail.s3.kth.se [130.237.43.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E137515237 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 20:22:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from assar@foo.sics.se) Received: (from assar@localhost) by foo.sics.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA54986; Sun, 5 Dec 1999 05:21:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from assar) To: Randell Jesup Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Portable way to compare struct stat's? References: <3845712D.F4D51A70@softweyr.com> <5lwvqu7as2.fsf@foo.sics.se> <5laenqz34x.fsf@foo.sics.se> From: Assar Westerlund Date: 05 Dec 1999 05:21:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: Randell Jesup's message of "04 Dec 1999 23:12:54 -0500" Message-ID: <5l1z92m2zy.fsf@foo.sics.se> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Randell Jesup writes: > Sure, depending on what's in a vnode (I haven't looked). Note that I was comparing the `pointers' and not the contents. The way the VFS works you only keep one vnode for every file. > That's what I was thinking of, partially. It makes binaries > more transportable, and source if we can get Linux/etc to add it to > their libraries. So write patches for Linux as well and get it installed there as well. Having it in *BSD and Linux is the best you can hope for in a short time scale. Getting it into commercial Unixes takes a few more years... /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message