From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 13 06:24:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C117CE7 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E617C1A91 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.130.115] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Un0xJ-0007ia-Bl; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:24:21 +0200 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r5D6OKpV000890; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:24:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r5D6OIt6000889; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:24:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:24:18 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: Are ports supposed to build and run on 10-CURRENT? Message-ID: <20130613062417.GA868@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <20130613031535.4087d7f9@bsd64.grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r235646 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.130.115 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Michael Gmelin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:24:30 -0000 El día Thursday, June 13, 2013 a las 08:07:14AM +0200, Eitan Adler escribió: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > So my question is: Are we port maintainers now really supposed to make > > ports work with CURRENT? > > This is generally up to the maintainer; however many committers run > -CURRENT and test on that by default. This was a widely general question and a general answer too; I'm afraid that not all committers run tests with -CURRENT and on both architectures (amd64 and i386); at least for KDE4 I can confirm that it is unable to build on -CURRENT r250588 i386 due to: 1. certain required ports does not compile with clang 2. for kdelibs4 (and others) the tool automoc4 SIGSEGV randomly (i.e. for different source files and if you run it again it works) all this on a SVN clean ports tree; the current situation with CURRENT/clang/ports is highly a concern; matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz, , http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211 UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5