Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:05:17 +0100 From: Chris Howells <howells@kde.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIA VT6103 support (VIA EPIA PD) Message-ID: <200509241605.26998.howells@kde.org> In-Reply-To: <200509221040.j8MAep8Q063279@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200509221040.j8MAep8Q063279@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart3048185.QlU0SCL8SJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 22 September 2005 11:40, Oliver Fromme wrote: > I know that both are supposed to be supported by FreeBSD. > However, searching the lists and PR database reveals that > a few people had problems with the VT6103 (and VT6102, it > seems), causing the interface to hang randomly when there > is a lot of traffic. I couldn't find any definite infor- > mation about whether those problems have been solved or > not. There is a BIOS bug on various Via boards that causes a lockup when large=20 amounts of DMA transfers happen, either via the ethernet interfaces or via= =20 IDE. It look a very long time for Via to admit that it happens and to start=20 attempting to issue a fix. The fix is a BIOS which is clearly marked as Beta. Personally I'd steer clear of such Via boards. =2D-=20 Cheers, Chris Howells -- chris@chrishowells.co.uk, howells@kde.org Web: http://www.chrishowells.co.uk, PGP ID: 0x33795A2C KDE/Qt/C++/PHP Developer: http://www.kde.org --nextPart3048185.QlU0SCL8SJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDNWs2F8Iu1zN5WiwRAopdAKCKMMFNpQ26HVlyJhmkpF81rsu9IACfSa4u RKQmEdi32F1NO1KFcwufCw8= =xATo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3048185.QlU0SCL8SJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200509241605.26998.howells>