From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 24 02:46:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D56A23A9; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6480364D89; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id y19so10439169wgg.35; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:46:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D94g2qIE8PiPzihfZMB/0Bv1BqEU8374Jp8I660WOsA=; b=nZSGG7qB0UBUERfqGqCb7QzyjCTj1oD4GcGbdqG5/LBl10hwwc1Otvc+jPurDp1sj/ 3W14RCzfnSH+mmkhcCRq19roWreEKhH3d4iAW4CKpFLKv6jEjPILxHA/5x4JoJYOYaS8 zrdJFGpTjYVaM3AdLHLqM5YWGyul7e9M68UbR1bxQdYXENBsYP70UwbI/IMdM31sI6Ii cFxIi357VNCh36ZmliLtjzs4wqWmns/980/+9Kf7tS5I+e5cBUg4l+F6ielghckgSXYt WSGwGUW5C1wGV1T8biSGEoAwBNaYZ/kNDZgkOWfVmvOKXYG6yY/4bz0FNOj3HWhG9Dxd OM1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.14.136 with SMTP id p8mr11525778wic.20.1419389209795; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:46:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.106.195 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:46:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <35AF9553-9536-41B0-8C2C-D907ED8E8531@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:46:49 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qbvPo15QkFHMBiojjpPMe17v84g Message-ID: Subject: Re: status of projects/numa? From: Adrian Chadd To: "K. Macy" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "attilio@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , Gavin Mu X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:46:51 -0000 On 23 December 2014 at 15:40, K. Macy wrote: > What's wrong with freebsd-arch? Do we really need a dedicated > discussion list? Or have I mis-parsed your suggestions? I was unclear. I don't care where the discussion is; I'm happy for it to be public. freebsd-arch@ is as good a place as any. -adrian > Cheers. > > -K > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> On 23 December 2014 at 02:19, Gavin Mu wrote: >>> Hi, Adrian, >>> >>> Thanks, I have checked out your ACPI related change for NUMA support. Looking forward to your further updates. >>> >>> Is the discussion public? it will be very helpful if there are any records. We have had a hacked and limited impl of NUMA, and wondering if we can help on a general design for FreeBSD. >> >> I'm 100% for having a public discussion list and discussion about >> adding more NUMA support. >> >> So please kick-start this a little - what can you share about your >> private NUMA support? >> >> >> >> >> -adrian >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"