From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 4 08:36:57 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA27221 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 08:36:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.interlog.com (root@smtp.interlog.com [198.53.145.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA27181 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 08:36:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from gold.interlog.com (batsy@gold.interlog.com [198.53.145.2]) by smtp.interlog.com (8.8.3/8.7.6) with ESMTP id LAA04214; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:35:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (batsy@localhost) by gold.interlog.com (8.8.3/8.6.10) with SMTP id LAA16441; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:36:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:36:19 -0500 (EST) From: jamie To: "Mikhail A. Sokolov" cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOCOL/snmp-CMU/pte.h In-Reply-To: <199612040102.EAA04164@megillah.demos.su> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > The stupid question goes bellow: Not a stupid question:) > > Anyone compiled nocol v 4.0 on FreeBSD 2.2-A? I exprerience lack of > while compiling cmu-smmp/apps/ part, which isn't what I wanted > it to do. When using the one from previous releases, it yells about lots of > redefinitions/mistakes. Maybe I miss something, but I don't see any pte.h > in 2.2-A, (c) find / . I had the same problem and decided to just use PerlNOCOL with some expect plugins. It's nicer that way:) -j "The beatings will continue until morale improves." Jamie Reid, Jr Sys-admin, batsy@interlog.com x232