From owner-freebsd-current  Thu May 31 15:24:33 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EED2837B424; Thu, 31 May 2001 15:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@[206.40.252.115])
	by relay.nuxi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4VMOOl69048;
	Thu, 31 May 2001 15:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f4VMOOj59922;
	Thu, 31 May 2001 15:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 15:24:24 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>,
	current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio
Message-ID: <20010531152423.A59822@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org
References: <20010531130155.A58258@dragon.nuxi.com> <XFMail.010531134600.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010531134600.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> It doesn't hurt to help distribute the load some, though.  Requiring
> each person who makes a change to compile it on every possible arch is
> not something that will scale as more and more archs are added.  If a
> committer can get someone else to perform some of these test compiles
> and fix any brokenness that
> comes up I think that is adequate.


Forgot to add, if others use the Alpha owners as simple test-compile
resources, (1) the Alpha owners will not get any other work done,
(2) will get quite tired of testing things that the patch author could
easily test himself.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message