From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Sat May 16 03:29:46 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BD22E2913
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 16 May 2020 03:29:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com)
Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com
 [24.113.41.81])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "ultimatedns.net",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49P9kd59v3z3LGJ;
 Sat, 16 May 2020 03:29:45 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com)
Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1])
 by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04G3U272000826
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO);
 Fri, 15 May 2020 20:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com)
X-Mailer: Cypht
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200515231150.GB516@lonesome.com>
From: Chris <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com>
Reply-To: bsd-lists@BSDforge.com
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Disallowing read() of a directory fd
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 20:30:08 -0700
Message-Id: <2ea8236f935a4c786a0f4f06ca1d3ea3@udns.ultimatedns.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49P9kd59v3z3LGJ
X-Spamd-Bar: -
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.58 / 15.00];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.60)[-0.598,0];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.978,0];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US];
 local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 03:29:46 -0000

On Fri, 15 May 2020 23:11:50 +0000 Mark Linimon linimon@lonesome=2Ecom said

> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:49:56PM -0700, Chris wrote:
> > Applications that fail in this regard, are poorly designed, and
> > need to step up=2E
>=20
> freshports=2Eorg currently shows:
>=20
>  39288 ports
>     94 deprecated
>      5 forbidden
>=20
> If you want to fix every poorly-designed application in that swamp,
> please feel free *=2E
>=20
> Oh yeah, bugzilla says:
>=20
>  2269 ports PRs
>=20
> So, there's plenty to do=2E
Indeed there is=2E But at last count, I was at 162 ports=2E So I think I'm
already pretty close to my limit=2E :-)

>=20
> mcl
>=20
> * there are days where my remark would be "that includes most of them"

--Chris