From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug  7 12:53:50 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2EA16A41F;
	Sun,  7 Aug 2005 12:53:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net)
Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B1244122;
	Sun,  7 Aug 2005 12:53:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net)
Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD))
	id 1E1kex-000Bt5-HW; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:53:47 +0200
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:53:47 +0200
From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net>
To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20050807125347.GA43837@voodoo.oberon.net>
References: <42F47C0D.2020704@freebsd.org> <42F51979.2020509@FreeBSD.org>
	<42F54DD4.7080901@freebsd.org> <op.su4gzdps9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
	<42F59AA8.2030605@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42F59AA8.2030605@freebsd.org>
X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon
X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE
Keywords: 579279786
Cc: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>,
	"freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:53:50 -0000

On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:22:48PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > Will portsnap improvement on to not delete any unoffical ports? I have 
> > about 15 unoffical ports here in local machine and they are living in 
> > /usr/ports for other tools' sake like portupgrade/pkgdb. I have never
> > use  it, but I read in the bottom of http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ .
> 
> Portsnap will not remove any ports which it doesn't know about.  Portsnap
> will only remove local modifications when they are in a port or infrastructure
> file (e.g., Mk/*) which portsnap is updating to a newer version.

Is portsnap also immune to Makefile.inc[local] and doesn't delete
them during update ?

-Kirill