From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 2 20:49:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0231416A41F for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:49:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clement@FreeBSD.org) Received: from goofy.cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99C9643D46 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:49:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clement@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 64734 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Nov 2005 21:49:22 +0100 Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 21:49:22 +0100 From: Clement Laforet To: Brandon Fosdick Message-ID: <20051102204922.GC45383@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org> References: <436442E5.4090508@bfoz.net> <20051030210955.GB49025@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org> <4365929F.1050303@bfoz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="da4uJneut+ArUgXk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4365929F.1050303@bfoz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: Clement Laforet , apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: www/apache21 update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:49:26 -0000 --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:42:23PM -0800, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > I noticed that www/apache2 installs > /usr/local/lib/apache2/apr-config whereas www/apache21 installs > /usr/local/bin/apr-1-config. Is this a mistake or intentional? It's historical. apache2 used to install his own version of apr. When=20 I grab maintainership, I decided to keep the old path to respect POLA,=20 since apache 2.0.x was already stable. apache21 port is designed to replace devel/apr or to use it if=20 installed from port. Currently apache 2.1 is a "moving" version and it's port follow the same way. The day apache 2.2 will be considered as stable, port will be frozen, and keep the same options, or at least backwark=20 compatible options. To answer Paul, I'll blindly depend on devel/apr when I can descently=20 rely to apr-*-config or whatever to know run time options. Another=20 point is that, IMHO, I need to guarantee apache users backward=20 compatiblity, like multiple bdb versions support. Current apr/ports framework need to support this. First of all is to=20 finish USE_APACHE=3Dapr. After that, we'll try to unify apr/svn/apache. clem --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDaSZSsRhfjwcjuh0RAv5wAKCjAfnDuP2z/0OM+TcIbKSqvKIshQCeMQBY XJukY3+vqfhJyJBWNzTJcGM= =pmlP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --da4uJneut+ArUgXk--