From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Mar 8 14:54:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA06221 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 14:54:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from franc.ucdavis.edu (franc.ucdavis.edu [128.120.8.183]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA06211 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 14:53:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com by franc.ucdavis.edu (8.8.5/UCD3.8.5) id OAA14682; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 14:50:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id WAA17166; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 22:50:44 GMT Message-ID: <19970308145043.54622@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 14:50:43 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? References: <199703022121.QAA10831@crh.cl.msu.edu> <199703022136.NAA06629@rah.star-gate.com> <19970308104612.52144@klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.65_p0 Reply-To: obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu X-Warning: Mutt Bites! Organization: The NUXI *BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Did anyone figure out why the 2.1.x gcc-2.6.3 is producing better code than 2.2 gcc-2.7.2? I get a faster rc5-56-client benchmark on my 486 with gcc-2.6.3 produced binary than the gcc-2.7.2, so I don't think it is all Pentium optimations. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)