Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 01 Oct 1998 21:48:55 +0200
From:      Gary Jennejohn <garyj@peedub.muc.de>
To:        asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: emacs lock files 
Message-ID:  <199810011948.VAA11472@peedub.muc.de>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 Oct 1998 01:45:46 PDT." <199810010845.BAA26182@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi Asami writes:
>Hi,
>
>I see that various emacsen install lock directories in all sorts of
>different places.  Can we merge them into one, or at least move them
>to a more standardized location?  In particular, I hate the ones in
>/usr/local.  (Writable directories in /usr/local?!?)
>
>Right now, we have
>
>emacs:  /usr/local/com/emacs/lock
>mule:   /usr/local/com/mule/lock
>xemacs: /var/run/xemacs/lock
>
>Is there a reason why they can't all share one directory?  I don't
>know about xemacs, but emacs/mule just have PID's in there so they
>should be interchangable.
>
>If we can standardize them, I propose /var/run/emacs/lock.
>

seems reasonable to me, but this means that the !xemacs will need a
shell script to recreate the directory after /etc/rc clobbers it.
xemacs{,20} already has one.

---
Gary Jennejohn
Home - garyj@muc.de
Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810011948.VAA11472>