Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:58:00 +0100 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quick question about PF and ALTQ Message-ID: <473823A8.9050905@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <55683.212.159.200.167.1194859072.squirrel@www.boosten.org> References: <53330.192.168.13.8.1194786209.squirrel@www.boosten.org> <20071111144325.GA3433@saraswathy.susmita.org> <3815.192.168.13.35.1194803377.squirrel@www.boosten.org> <20071112070422.GA31412@saraswathy.susmita.org> <55683.212.159.200.167.1194859072.squirrel@www.boosten.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Boosten wrote: > On Mon, November 12, 2007 08:04, Girish Venkatachalam wrote: > >> Hope the above explanation suffices. > > Yu, it does. Very nice explanation, thanx. > >> >> Can you clarify your needs a bit more? > > Well, it's actually quite simple: our internet access line, which is used > by several people (directly, without a proxy server, but with a FreeBSD > firewall). Our management wants to block unwanted traffic (so not: wants > to block unwanted sited - which would be very easy), like p2p and online > radio, since this traffic is: > - non business related > - bandwidth consuming > > Peter You just drop all traffic except for that over wanted ports, such as for http, https, ftp, smtp, pop3, maybe some instant messengers... That won't help against tunneling, though.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?473823A8.9050905>