Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:06:25 -0400
From:      "David P. Caldwell" <david@code.davidpcaldwell.com>
To:        George Liaskos <geo.liaskos@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Chromium 19 dumps core on 9.0-RELEASE (i386)
Message-ID:  <CABBxOKmBhj=QO5Ptz4WbCzHctqBM18rcTSGmLci0HWJ8CAnyTQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANcjpOAY79qw9UoBCMSrtEQDV-bVPrMxY746ddujobGN8epVcQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CABBxOKmXP6SeegX2PtS9iTajBC5H37OpSe77qDz-NbtvkgPKJQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120607060457.GC98376@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CANcjpOC-vRK8p4C5SyZ7kbTjACoJrTY5jX1PbC3Zb-qqex2afA@mail.gmail.com> <CABBxOKn%2Bpr3Eo3TYdGHHwXd06jshSA_HUVwfgAqspZMG1cUr2w@mail.gmail.com> <CANcjpOAY79qw9UoBCMSrtEQDV-bVPrMxY746ddujobGN8epVcQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I don't know much about native libraries -- what would be the possible
causes of a build with debugging symbols being functional but a build
without them crashing? Is that a compiler bug?

I built with gcc, if it's relevant.

-- David.

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:11 AM, George Liaskos <geo.liaskos@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:46 PM, David P. Caldwell
> <david@code.davidpcaldwell.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:46 AM, George Liaskos <geo.liaskos@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 07:34:05PM -0400, David P. Caldwell wrote:
>>>>> I built the latest Chromium 19 by building against the 9.0-RELEASE
>>>>> *packages*. I did not want to update all my ports and incur the
>>>>> various library problems that resulted the last time I tried that. I
>>>>> may try it next.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am rebuilding with debug symbols, as when I tried to view
>>>>> chrome.core in gdb, it just gave me a huge backtrace of "??"
>>>>> instances.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had Chromium 18 running successfully with an older version of the
>>>>> ports tree, built from source. But I can't reproduce that.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm building inside a VirtualBox instance, if that makes any difference.
>>>>>
>>>>> I recognize this all may not be a very useful bug report, but I'm
>>>>> still learning to file useful ones, so please bear with me.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org mailing list
>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chromium
>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chromium-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>>>
>>>> Confirmed, I got the same on my eeepc.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Bapt
>>>
>>> Debug build works for me under i386 vm, release crashes... I didn't
>>> have enough time to debug this.
>>>
>>> Feedback is always welcome and needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> George
>>
>> What do you mean by "debug build" -- one with debug symbols enabled
>> during make configure?
>>
>> I tried to build that and the build failed, and I gave up at that
>> point, but I can keep trying.
>>
>> Of course, the reason I was trying to do the debug build was to find
>> the problem, but are you saying that enabling the debug symbols
>> somehow fixes the problem?
>>
>> -- David.
>
> Yes, with the debug option enabled chromium does not crash. It only
> produces some error messages from the GPU thread about libGL being
> old.
>
> Most probably you are running out of memory, that is why you cannot
> finish the compile. I had to add swap.. even though my desktop has
> 16GiB of ram they are not usable from the vm, i will try to recompile
> the kernel with PAE.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABBxOKmBhj=QO5Ptz4WbCzHctqBM18rcTSGmLci0HWJ8CAnyTQ>