Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:15:32 +0200
From:      "Svein Skogen (Listmail account)" <svein-listmail@stillbilde.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OCI support in PHP is dead
Message-ID:  <4E1EC1C4.9010002@stillbilde.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E1EBA43.50508@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <20110714061600.GA45797@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4E1EBA43.50508@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig414D7066D34E8AFF95A4F8A9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 14.07.2011 11:43, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 14/07/2011 07:16, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>> The databases/php5-oci8 port exists no more, and databases/php52-oci8
>> is marked as vulnerable.
>>
>=20
> Oracle 8 is pretty obsolete now.  Now, the only options for getting mor=
e
> up to date support are
>=20
>    -- persuading Oracle to release eg. an Oracle Instant Client package=

>       for FreeBSD
>=20
>    -- somehow being able to use the Linux client software under
>       emulation.
>=20
> I've no idea what Oracle's response to the first option would be, but I=

> suspect their response might well be that they won't get enough return
> to justify the cost of producing a FreeBSD native client.

I suspect getting oracle to create such a client would cost (per user)
about half a cent less than replacing the oracle DB would. They're
(in)famous for such calculations.

> The second option looks pretty difficult to me -- making a PHP shared
> object that links to a Linux shlib but that is itself linked into
> various PHP applications.

This one might be a bit cheaper.

> The future looks Postgresql shaped to me.

Or any other non-yacht-sponsoring DB.

//Svein

p.s. I've had the "pleasure" of having dealt with Oracle on several
occasions.

--=20
--------+-------------------+-------------------------------
  /"\   |Svein Skogen       | svein@d80.iso100.no
  \ /   |Solberg =D8stli 9    | PGP Key:  0xE5E76831
   X    |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no
  / \   |Norway             | PGP Key:  0xCE96CE13
        |                   | svein@stillbilde.net
 ascii  |                   | PGP Key:  0x58CD33B6
 ribbon |System Admin       | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net
Campaign|stillbilde.net     | PGP Key:  0x22D494A4
        +-------------------+-------------------------------
        |msn messenger:     | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575
        |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle:    SS16503-RIPE
--------+-------------------+-------------------------------
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
------------------------------------------------------------
                     Picture Gallery:
          https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/
------------------------------------------------------------


--------------enig414D7066D34E8AFF95A4F8A9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4ewcoACgkQODUnwSLUlKRQ7ACgrGChoOyVHwYVG9geMhgtOyJs
3+MAn3rbjbyaQuHY9wTm9++WBusxMFKG
=BGck
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig414D7066D34E8AFF95A4F8A9--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E1EC1C4.9010002>