From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 10:03:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D2716A4CE; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A14943D75; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:03:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0KI2dsX015305; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:02:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0KI2YqR015304; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:02:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:02:34 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20040120190234.A13333@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <1074590694.85583.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com> <1074617147.757.16.camel@gyros> <20040120171315.GH94636@FreeBSD.org> <1074619795.757.43.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1074619795.757.43.camel@gyros>; from marcus@freebsd.org on Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:29:55PM -0500 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.0.6; AVE 6.23.0.2; VDF 6.23.0.35 cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway cc: Eivind Eklund cc: Oliver Eikemeier Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:03:10 -0000 On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:29:55PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > I agree. This approach seems the most flexible. As for not being able > to do non-root installs, this is a bogus argument as one could simply > override PORT_DBDIR as they would PKG_DBDIR (even with the original > patch). > I was taking about non-root builds, e.g. single ports checked out outside of PKGBASE to do maintenance work, not non-root installs. In an environment where non-root installs are done your argument is valid. Not being able to do non-root builds compilcates the job of maintainers.