From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Aug 12 15:15:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA24981 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 15:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns2.gamespot.com (ns2.gamespot.com [206.169.18.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA24975 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 15:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tiramisu.gamespot.com (tiramisu.gamespot.com [206.169.18.119]) by ns2.gamespot.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA05990 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 15:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19970812151655.012524a0@mail.gamespot.com> X-Sender: ian@mail.gamespot.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 15:16:55 -0700 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Ian Kallen Subject: Re: bulk mailer In-Reply-To: References: <199708101242.UAA01414@vas.tomsk.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk See, you can include the port with no spam hazards if people don't know how to use ports ;) At 05:32 PM 8/12/97 -0400, you wrote: >> Hello Colleagues. >> >> Do you think it was a wise idea to include a bulk mailer into the ports >> collection? It looks like encouraging spammers. >> >> >> -- >> Victor Sudakov >> http://www.tomsk.su/r/persons/vas.htm > >Hi Victor/Gang: > >PLEASE DON'T DO IT! The disadvantages heavily outway the advantages >(actualy, I can't come up with any advantages, or maybe the barrage >of recent SPAM has made me very very very bitter). > >Bernie > > > -- Ian Kallen ian@gamespot.com Director of Technology and Web Administration SpotMedia Communications http://www.gamespot.com/ http://www.videogamespot.com/