From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 29 11:37:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647A215294 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 11:37:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA14542; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 11:35:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 11:35:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Soren Schmidt Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/share/examples/atapi scripts wrong In-Reply-To: <199904281855.UAA03456@freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Doug White wrote: > > Hello ... > > > > The burn* scripts in /usr/share/examples/atapi try to use wormcontrol for > > some reason, which obviously doesn't work. Should we just dump them, or > > does someone have one that uses mkisofs/cdrecord that would be > > appropriate? > > What planet are you from ?? They work for ATAPI drives, and have > been since they were introduced, all the time using wormcontrol.. > > Our SCSI system (CAM) dont support wormdevices (the old did), but that > is something totally unrelated to /usr/share/examples/atapi. > ^^^^^ > Or you where just kidding ?? :) No. Someone on -questions complained that they didn't work. cdrecord seems the future of burning anyway, so why are we will mucking with worm*? Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message