From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Jun 20 12:39:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E762837BCD1 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:39:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA55297; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 21:39:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: Warner Losh , mjacob@feral.com, Matthew Dillon , freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP discussion moving to freebsd-smp In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:36:19 MDT." <200006201936.NAA20788@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 21:39:02 +0200 Message-ID: <55295.961529942@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <200006201936.NAA20788@nomad.yogotech.com>, Nate Williams writes: >> attitude, having been one of the primary people through the >> 1.0 to 2.0 transition I know how many developers that cost us. > >And how many would that be? I don't remember the masses leaving us >because of the 1.0 -> 2.0 transition, but because of the lawsuit. I recently had reason to go through all the news archives and mail archives such as they exist, and we lost *a lot* of people between 1.1.5.1 and 2.0. Most seem to have gravitated to Linux. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message