From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Oct  6 02:39:56 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA11703
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 02:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id CAA11682
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 02:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id IAA05884; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 08:37:06 +0100
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199810060737.IAA05884@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: ipfw SkipTo behavior changed
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 08:37:05 +0100 (MET)
Cc: jonny@jonny.eng.br, Jeff@Wagsky.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <17875.907666459@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Oct 6, 98 02:34:00 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > The reason i did not fixed (yet) the code myself is that i think
> > it is not that safe to rely on this feature in a security module
> > such as ipfw. But if people want me to revert the code to the
> > default behaviour i have no problems with that.
> 
> Considering the questions which have swirled around this, I think
> restoring the default behavior would be a good idea.

ok fine (but i only see one such msg plus a couple of replies, did
i miss some ?)

	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message