From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 20 14:42:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F14916A4CE for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:42:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACE643D31 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])i7KEgaWd018342; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:42:37 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) i7KEgSBo004214; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:42:28 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost)i7KEgS3w004213; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:42:28 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:42:28 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Atte Peltomaki Message-ID: <20040820144228.GB3997@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20040820145251.GA36893@norsu.kameli.org> <20040820165602.GA737@norsu.kameli.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040820165602.GA737@norsu.kameli.org> cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Manpage for snd_solo X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:42:39 -0000 On 2004-08-20 16:56, Atte Peltomaki wrote: > here's the solo.4 manpage as attachment, too. > .Dd August 20, 2004 > .Dt SOLO 4 > .Os > .Sh NAME > .Nm solo > .Nd > .Fx > ESS Solo-1/1E PCI bridge device driver I'm not sure if makewhatis(1) or other tools that automatically extract the name and description of manpages is going to be happy with .Nd being split in multiple lines. If this is a possible source of problems, we can always rewrite this as: .Nm solo .Nd ESS Solo-1/1E PCI bridge device driver since other sound drivers (i.e. gusc(4)) use this scheme already :-) Otherwise this looks fine to me. If nobody else feels like it I'll commit it later tonight or early tomorrow morning (Sat Aug 21).